In memory of Suzie Schuyler, our beloved President. She will be deeply missed.

March 8, 2026

It is with profound sadness that the Henry George School of Social Science announces the passing of our beloved President, Suzie Schuyler, on March 8, 2026.

Suzie was a remarkable leader, a devoted champion of this School's mission, and a cherished member of our community. Her passion for education, her generosity of spirit, and her unwavering commitment to the Henry George School of Social Science inspired all who had the privilege of knowing and working alongside her.

During her leadership, Suzie brought warmth, wisdom, and quiet determination to everything she did. She cared deeply about the people around her and about carrying forward the ideas and educational work that define this institution. Her vision guided the School through consequential moments, and her absence will be felt profoundly by our board, our staff, and the supporters whose lives she touched.

We extend our deepest condolences to Suzie's family and friends, and to all who were fortunate enough to share in her life.

Her legacy will endure in the work we carry on in her memory.

— The Henry George School of Social Science

WHAT WOULD HENRY GEORGE SAY?

Still Relevant, Still Poignant

ANALYSIS

Is California a Good Role Model?

By Thomas B. Edsall

September 13, 2018

What Would Henry George Say?

By Dr. Marty Rowland

Edsall says … “The left celebrates California’s rapid growth while turning a blind eye to its inequality. The right decries poverty and inequality while discounting rapid economic growth.” This is an excellent reason to discard the artificial and false division of US society in left and right boxes. The question must be … how does society generate the wealth necessary to keep a baseline of services sustainable so that we all have equal access to natural opportunities and liberty. Tax wages and capitalist profit, then there will be less of them. Tax only land and none of it goes away … in fact, if California did the right thing and tax only land value, they’d have high growth and less poverty because there would be great revenues available for those important social adjustments like healthcare, education, job training, entrepreneur incubators, clean air, low carbon, safe water, and sustainable waste management. It’s a laugh to hear conservative think tanks decrying poverty under “left” policies, when in fact poverty is the product of people implementing policies in line with the entire political spectrum.